Business, Management and Economics Engineering | 2026
Authors: Karazijienė Ž.; Buivydaitė A.
DOI: 10.3846/bmee.2026.25686
Journal: Business, Management and Economics Engineering
Year: 2026
Publisher: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Document Type: Article
Open Access: All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
Cited by: 0
Purpose – Assess the level of the circular economy in EU countries between 2020 and 2023, ranking them according to circular economy indicators and identifying changes in their positions. Research methodology – The study used the European Commission’s 2023 set of indicators to evaluate the performance of the circular economy across EU countries. Twenty-three indicators were selected based on data availability. Missing data were forecasted using the moving average method to ensure completeness for subsequent analysis. The CRITIC method was then applied to determine indicator weights and rank countries, followed by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate and compare national positions. Findings – The results show stable circular economy levels across the EU but with clear gaps between leading and lagging countries. Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy perform strongest, while Bulgaria and Romania progress slowly due to structural constraints. Lithuania, Austria, and other mid-tier countries advance gradually, with ranking shifts revealing uneven implementation of the EU Circular Economy Action Plan. Overall, the findings compare national progress and highlight key drivers and barriers to the transition. Research limitations – The study was constrained by incomplete and inconsistent EU statistical data, which required applying the Moving Average method to estimate missing values. In addition, the absence of a standardised composite indicator framework limited methodological comparability. Future research should prioritise improving data availability and creating unified guidelines for building composite indicators to strengthen reliability and cross-country benchmarking. Practical implications – The results provide policymakers and industry stakeholders with a clear ranking of EU countries’ progress in implementing circular economy principles, enabling targeted improvement strategies. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor national performance, allocate resources effectively, and develop standardised evaluation frameworks for sustainability initiatives. Originality/Value – This study integrates the CRITIC and TOPSIS methods with the latest EU indicators – a combination rarely used in circular economy analysis. It offers a comprehensive multi-criteria assessment of EU countries, unlike earlier studies based on single or fragmented indicators. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
circular economy; CRITIC-TOPSIS; European Union; multi-criteria decision-making; sustainability