Human Behavior, Development and Society | 2026
Authors: Limwongthong A.; Prayoonvong N.
DOI: 10.62370/hbds.v27i1.281246
Journal: Human Behavior, Development and Society
Year: 2026
Publisher: Asia-Pacific International University
Document Type: Article
Open Access: All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Cited by: 0
Aim/Purpose: This research addresses a critical knowledge gap in understanding how Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand, as part of an emerging economy, navigate digital transformation during periods of crisis. Specifically, the study examined digital transformation leadership practices that enable SMEs to successfully adopt digital technologies, manage organizational change, and sustain organizational resilience under conditions of uncertainty and disruption. By focusing on leadership as the central mechanism linking technology adoption and resilience, the study moves beyond technology-centric explanations and highlights the human and strategic dimensions of digital transformation in SMEs. Introduction/Background: Digital transformation has become an essential strategic priority for organizations facing increasing environmental volatility, technological disruption, and crisis conditions. While existing literature has extensively examined digital transformation in large corporations within developed economies, research on SMEs in emerging markets remains limited. This gap is particularly significant in Thailand, where SMEs account for approximately 43% of gross domestic product and employ nearly 72% of the national workforce, positioning them as a cornerstone of economic stability. During crisis periods, such as economic shocks or systemic disruptions, the ability of SMEs to digitally transform while maintaining operational continuity becomes a matter of national economic resilience. However, prevailing digital leadership frameworks are largely derived from large-scale organizations and may not adequately reflect the contextual constraints, cultural characteristics, and leadership structures of Thai SMEs. Consequently, there is insufficient empirical understanding of how SME leaders in emerging economies conceptualize and enact digital transformation leadership during crises. Methodology: In this study, a qualitative multiple case study approach was adopted to explore digital transformation leadership in depth and within context. Twelve Thai SMEs that had successfully implemented digital transformation initiatives during crisis periods were purposefully selected using theoretical sampling. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with SME owners, senior managers, and key stakeholders directly involved in digital transformation initiatives. These interviews were complemented by documentary analysis of organizational plans, digital project records, and internal communications, as well as direct organizational observations. The data analysis followed systematic within-case and cross-case analytical procedures, enabling the identification of recurring patterns, leadership practices, and contextual mechanisms across diverse organizational settings. This methodological design allowed for rich, nuanced insights into leadership processes that could not be captured through purely quantitative approaches. Findings: The findings revealed three primary dimensions of successful digital transformation leadership in Thai SMEs during crisis periods. First, adaptive strategic vision was evident in 91.7% of cases, highlighting leaders’ ability to articulate a clear transformation direction while remaining flexible to rapidly changing conditions. Second, collaborative technological integration was observed in all cases (100%), emphasizing leaders’ roles in aligning digital technologies with organizational capabilities, employee readiness, and stakeholder expectations. Third, resilient change management was present in 83.3% of cases, reflecting leadership practices that guided employees through transformation while safeguarding operational stability. Across cases, leaders demonstrated what this study conceptualized as “adaptive resilience,” a dynamic leadership capability that integrates strategic foresight, technological alignment, and people-centered change leadership. Organizations reported that these leadership practices led to an average improvement of 32% in operational efficiency, a 28% increase in customer satisfaction, and a 24% growth in revenue, indicating both short-term performance gains and longer-term sustainability. Contribution/Impact on Society: This research extends digital leadership theory by proposing an integrated framework of digital transformation leadership tailored to SMEs in emerging economies during crisis situations. The study contributes conceptually by introducing adaptive resilience as a leadership capability that enables organizations to balance innovation with stability, particularly under crisis conditions. Practically, the findings offer actionable insights for SME leaders seeking to manage digital transformation amid uncertainty. At the societal level, the research informs policymakers and supportive institutions by demonstrating that effective digital transformation requires leadership development and organizational learning, not merely investment in technological infrastructure. Strengthening leadership capacity in SMEs contributes directly to sustainable economic development and crisis preparedness in emerging market economies. Recommendations: Based on these findings, SME leaders are encouraged to adopt phased and flexible digital transformation strategies, ensuring alignment between technological initiatives and organizational readiness. Comprehensive stakeholder communication strategies should be prioritized, as 92% of successful cases had implemented systematic communication to build trust and employee engagement. Leaders should also cultivate adaptive resilience by integrating strategic vision, participatory leadership, and continuous learning. For policymakers, the study recommends shifting policy emphasis toward leadership digital literacy, managerial capability development, and organizational learning systems, rather than focusing solely on hardware or platform adoption. Research Limitation: This study was limited to Thai SMEs and therefore may not be directly generalizable to other cultural or institutional contexts. The focus on successful digital transformation cases may underrepresent challenges and failure dynamics encountered by less successful organizations. Additionally, while the qualitative methodology provided in-depth insights, it limited statistical generalizability across broader SME populations. Future Research: Future studies should examine digital transformation leadership across different cultural contexts and emerging economies to assess the transferability of adaptive resilience as a leadership capability. Longitudinal research could explore how leadership strategies evolve over time and across different crisis phases. Comparative studies between successful and unsuccessful digital transformation cases would further enrich understanding of failure mechanisms. Such research would contribute to a more comprehensive and balanced theory of digital transformation leadership in SMEs. © 2026, Asia-Pacific International University. All rights reserved.
crisis management; Digital transformation; resilience; SME leadership